Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Marathon India Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 235/JP/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/07/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Marathon India Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Jaipur)

ITAT Jaipur held that ignorance of law and bona fide belief cannot be termed as sufficient cause and hence condonation of delay in filing of an appeal not granted.

Facts- The assessment of the assessee was completed u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. Subsequently, Pr.CIT examined the assessment order and observed certain contradictions in the claim of deduction u/s. 80IE on the part of the assessee and foundthe same is not verifiable/allowable and the AO has allowed the same in the assessment proceedings .Thus the Pr.CIT held that the order erroneous as well as prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.

Notably, there is a delay of 324 days in filing of an appeal and accordingly condonation was prayed.

Conclusion- Held that the assessee is a limited company and assisted by a number of professionals including legal experts and they had been engaged in the litigation with Revenue Deptt. at different stages before different forums and non-filing of appeal against the impugned order u/s. 263 of the Act because of ignorance of law and bona fide belief cannot be termed as ‘’sufficient cause’’ as explained under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031