This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Without Mutuality of Interest, Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 Inapplicable
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Punj Brothers Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Punj Brothers Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh)
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Chandigarh has quashed the imposition of penalty and interest on Punj Brothers Limited for alleged non-payment of customs duty on the clearance of goods. The case revolved around related party transactions and the application of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000.
The Department contended that Punj Brothers Limited and M/s Lal Punj Brother Pvt. Limited are related persons in terms of Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and, therefore...
