Case Law Details
Smt Ganigara Rekha Venugopal Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Introduction: In the case of Smt Ganigara Rekha Venugopal Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore), the assessee’s claim of deduction under ‘Income from Other Sources’ was questioned. This dispute is related to the valuation of a site sold, with the assessing officer (AO) limiting the cost to a lower figure than claimed by the assessee. The ITAT order restores the matter back to the AO for re-assessment.
Analysis: The case revolves around the sale of developed land by the appellant, who contested the valuation calculated by the AO. The AO’s calculation of cost was based on the original land area, not considering that the saleable area post-development was smaller. This resulted in a lower cost per sq. ft, and consequently, a lower permissible deduction. The CIT(A) upheld the AO’s decision due to insufficient evidence from the appellant.
However, ITAT found that the evidence produced by the appellant, such as the approved plan issued by BIAAPA showing a lesser saleable area, had not been considered by the AO or CIT(A). Therefore, ITAT ordered the case to be restored to the AO, with instructions to consider the new evidence and provide the appellant an opportunity for a fair hearing.
Conclusion: The ITAT order in the Smt Ganigara Rekha Venugopal Vs ACIT case sheds light on the complexities of land valuation for tax deductions and the importance of providing all necessary documents to substantiate claims. By restoring the case to the AO, ITAT ensures that due process is followed and all evidence is considered in tax matters. This case serves as a reminder for all taxpayers to adequately document and substantiate their claims for deductions.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
