Case Law Details
Kongnoli Sarva Seva Society Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Introduction: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Pune recently delivered an impactful ruling in the Kongnoli Sarva Seva Society Ltd Vs ITO case. ITAT set aside the order from the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), making it clear that incorrect claims of deductions or expenses in an Income Tax Return (ITR) do not amount to concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The appellant had challenged the penalty imposed by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The case hinged on the interpretation of section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, related to penalties for concealing income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The ITAT found that the appellant society had, indeed, made mistakes in their ITR, which led to certain additions under section 80P of the Act and the taxation of consequential income. However, following the precedence set by the Supreme Court in ‘Reliance Petro Products Pvt. Ltd.’, it was ruled that these mistakes did not amount to concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars.
Interestingly, the ruling also pointed out the divergent interpretations by the CIT(A) and NFAC, even though the same set of facts and circumstances were presented to both. The CIT(A) had allowed the appellant’s appeal and deleted the penalty, while the NFAC dismissed the appeal.
Conclusion: This ruling brings forth a clear message that incorrect claims in an ITR do not automatically amount to concealment of income. It also emphasizes the importance of consistency in interpretations across different appellate authorities. This verdict by ITAT Pune will undoubtedly have a significant impact on future assessments and appeals related to penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
