This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CENVAT Credit Permissible Even Without Registration Under Rule 5
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Commissioner of Service Tax Vs Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Limited (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Commissioner of Service Tax Vs Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Limited (CESTAT Chennai)
In a recent judgment passed by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Chennai, it was ruled that CENVAT credit is allowable even if the premises from which the service is exported are not registered under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. This case, Commissioner of Service Tax Vs Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Limited, sets a precedent for future tax and legal proceedings in this context.
The Aricent Technologies case centered around the company’s request for a refund...
