Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Johnson & Johnson Private Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1740/MUM/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/06/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Johnson & Johnson Private Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that as the assessee ceases to be an ‘eligible assessee’ under provisions of section 144C of the Income Tax Act, extended time limit for assessment is not available to AO. Accordingly, order of TPO is barred by limitation.

Facts- Assessee Company is subsidiary of M/s Johnson & Johnson, USA, engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing of various consumer care, healthcare and diagnostic products. It has five different divisions in India.

The learned Transfer Pricing Officer passed order under Section 92CA (3) of the Act on 30th January, 2015, proposing an adjustment of ₹320,13,82,586/-. The learned Dispute Resolution Panel restricted the transfer pricing adjustment at ₹89,91,09,379/-. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed.

It is also the claim of the assessee that as the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer is invalid, the assessee cannot be said to be an ‘eligible assessee’ in terms of explanation to section 144C of the Act and hence, the final assessment order passed on 26 February 2016 is barred by limitation.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031