Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hari Chand Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No.722/Asr/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/06/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Hari Chand Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)

Brief fact of the case is that the assessee deposited cash in the bank account amount to Rs.90,17,000/-. The assessee claimed that the amount was received from sale of the property. The said amount, which was deposited in PNB, Phillaur Branch, bearing a/c no. 0384000105228751. The ld. AO had assessed the said amount as unexplained cash deposit and addition was confirmed u/s 69A of the Act. During the assessment, further the addition was made on undisclosed interest income amount to Rs.60,996/- with the total income of the assessee. Aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) after considering the submission of the assessee upheld the order of the ld. AO. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed the appeal before us.

The issue was grabbed up such a way that the revenue is claiming that the registered deed is duly showing the consideration Rs.24,65,000/- related to sale of property. Whereas the assessee deposited cash in the bank account amount to Rs.90,17,000/-. The addition of interest amount to Rs.60,996/- was agitated by the assessee before the bench. The ld. AR argued that the addition of cash deposit is lack of verification by the revenue authorities, before the appeal and assessment stages. In fact, the said appeal is lack of verification from end of revenue. With consent of both the parties, the matter is remitted back to the ld. AO for further adjudication de novo. Needless to say, the assessee should get a reasonable opportunity of hearing in the setting aside proceeding. We adjudicate the Amended Ground No-4 first. The rest of the grounds are remained only for academic purposes.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT AMRITSAR

The instant appeal of the assessee was filed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -2, Jalandhar,[in brevity the ‘CIT (A)’] order passed u/s 250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity ‘the Act’] for A.Y. 2011-12.The impugned order was emanated from the order of the ld. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Phagwara, [in brevity ‘ the AO’] order passed u/s 144/147 of the Act.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031