Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Worship Infraprojects Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 394/JP/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/05/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Worship Infraprojects Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)

ITAT Jaipur held that referring impugned domestic transaction to TPO u/s 92CA is invalid in view of omission of clause (i) of section 92BA vide Finance Act, 2017.

Facts- The assessee M/s. Worship Infraprojects Private Limited was formerly known as M/s. Om Metals – SPML Infraprojects Private Ltd. The appellant is SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) formed as a joint venture company of M/s. Om Metals Infra Projects Ltd. & M/s. Subhash Projects & Marketing Ltd now known as SPML Infraprojects Ltd.

It is mainly contested by the assessee that AO has grossly erred in referring the matter with TPO by invoking section 92CA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Conclusion- It is clear that once a particular provision of a section was omitted from the statute, it shall be deemed to be omitted from its inception until and unless there is some saving clause or provision to make it clear that action taken or proceeding initiated under that provision or section would continue and would not be left on account of omission.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031