Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Smt. Syama Reddy Malireddy (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Smt. Syama Reddy Malireddy (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad held that for the purpose of claiming deduction u/s 54F of the Act, it is essential for the assessee to prove that she does not have more than a residential house at the time of claiming deduction u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act. Facts- In the present case, assessee had claimed deduction u/s 54F of Rs.3,63,73,330/-towards purchase of residential property at Hyderabad. However, the claim of assessee was not allowed by the Assessing Officer after examining the submissions of the assessee, as she failed to fulfill the conditions pre...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031