Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Shri Parvez Mohammed Hussain Ghaswala (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 3318/Mum/2013 & ITA No. 819/Mum/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/10/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2004-05 & 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief of the Case

ITAT Mumbai held in the case of ITO vs. Shri Parvez Mohammed Hussain Ghaswala that it is undisputed that papers showing the name of “Parvez Sir” were found in the premises of Alliance Hotel during the course of search action and not from assessee. Papers found were not in his handwriting. The partner of Alliance Hotel, Shri Kasam Ghaswala in his statement has stated that payment made to “Parvez Sir” is not the amount paid to the assessee. Neither the survey party nor the Assessing Officer of Alliance Hotel recorded the statement of assessee. Assessee, in his statement before the Assessing Officer, has categorically stated that he is not “Pervez Sir” as mentioned in the papers found from the premises of Alliance Hotel. Assessee also objected to the action of the Assessing Officer in making addition under section 69A. For invoking provisions of section 69A assessee should be the owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or any other valuable articles. In this case of assessee he was not found to be the owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or any other valuable articles. In such a situation invoking of provisions of section 69A was not justified.

Facts of the Case

The Assessee was a partner in M/s. Alliance Hotel upto 14.11.2006. This firm has been running hotel in the name of Empire Royale Hotel. As on 14.11.2006, the partners of this firm were (a) Rukhsana Khalid Ghaswala (b) Farank Omidazdeh and (c) Parvez Mohammed Hussain Ghaswala. Subsequently, the assessee has retired on14.11.2006 and in place of him Kasarn Khalid Ghaswala and Mr. Zishan Khand Ghaswala were admitted into the partnership with aforesaid remaining two partners. M/s. Alliance Hotel wanted to reconstruct and renovate its hotel premises. The firm approached Corporation Bank for a loan to enable it to re construct and renovate the hotel premises. An arrangement was made by the firm whereby the pay orders/cheque were issued in the name of certain suppliers of materials who were prepared to give bills to the Bank and after receiving the cheques from the Bank against the loan sanctioned. These suppliers claimed to be agreed to withdraw the loan amounts received and after retaining 1 % of the amount received towards their commission, agreed to pass on the balance amount of cash to M/s Alliance Hotel.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031