Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Siddha Chetty Natarajan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Siddha Chetty Natarajan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Chennai held that amount of Rs. 14 Lakhs received in cash for sale of immovable property is against the provisions of section 269SS of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, penalty under section 271D imposable. Facts- The assessee has received a sum of Rs. 14 lakhs in cash on sale of immovable property. Since, the assessee has violated provisions of section 269SS of the Income-tax Act, 1961, AO issued a show cause notice and called upon the assessee to explain as to why penalty u/s. 271D of the Act cannot be levied. AO, however was not convinced wi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930