This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Segregation in Works Contract & Materials supply not maintainable if Agreement provides for lump-sum payment
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Buldelkhand Engineers Vs Commissioner Commmercial Taxes U.P. Lucknow (Allahabad High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Allahabad High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Buldelkhand Engineers Vs Commissioner Commmercial Taxes U.P. Lucknow (Allahabad High Court)
It is not in dispute that a written agreement was executed between the assessee – revisionist and Auraiya Gas Power Project. Clause 2.4 categorically provided that the cost included the material and the labour for laying pipeline, the work was to be executed by the assessee. Clause 3 read with Clause 3.1 of the Contract mentioned the total value of the contract as Rs.10,67,517/-. The Tribunal had noted the relevant clauses of the agreement in its judgment but relying upon specification of work/ten...
how to GST deductible slab rates of minimum and maximum amount of the contractor/vender. and
pl. provide rates of TDS IT and TDS GST slab of minimum and maximum amount to the contractor.