This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty cannot be imposed under Rules 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 on employee of Company
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Hubergroup India Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Hubergroup India Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
As regard, penalty imposed on Shri. Suresh Nair employee of the appellant’s Company. I find that the issue of correct calculation of Cenvat Credit on the invoice issued by the 100% EOU was always in dispute, therefore, mala fide cannot be attributed to the employee of the Company in the facts of the present case. Moreover, he is not beneficiary of any wrong doing by the Company. Accordingly, considering the peculiar facts of the present case , I find that the penalty Shri. Suresh Nair employee of the Company cannot be imp...
