Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dr. Reddy S Laboratories Limited Vs Commissioner Commercial Tax (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Sales/Trade Tax Revision No. 375 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/12/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Dr. Reddy S Laboratories Limited Vs Commissioner Commercial Tax (Allahabad High Court)

Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri R.S. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

This revision has been preferred against the order passed on the stay application by the Tribunal granting relief of 75% waiver of disputed amount of tax to be deposited before the appeal is finally decided by first appellate authority. The assessment was made ex-parte vide order dated 19.03.2021. Against which a recall application was moved by the assessee and the matter was reopened. Thereafter, an assessment was made and a tax liability of Rs.1,89,89,122/- was imposed against the revisionist. Against the said order, a first appeal was preferred along with a stay application before the Additional Commissioner Grade-II (Appeal)-IIIrd State Tax, Ghaziabad. The first appellate authority reduced the quantum of the tax to be deposited before entertaining of the appeal to the tune of 50% by order dated 12.10.2022. Against the order passed on the stay application, the assessee preferred a second appeal before the Commercial Tax Tribunal, Ghaziabad Bench-Ist, Ghaziabad and the Tribunal vide order dated 03.11.2022 has reduced the quantum and had directed that the assessee was required to deposit 25% of the disputed amount of tax and rest of 75% of the dispute amount of tax was stayed.

Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that order passed was ex-parte and quantum of turn over has been enhanced without issuing notice as mandated under Section 28(3) and (4) of the Value Added Tax Act.

On the contrary, learned Standing Counsel has invited the attention of the Court to assessment order dated 16.09.2022 wherein a finding has been recorded by assessing authority that initially the assessment order was passed ex-parte but subsequently on the application moved under Section 32 of VAT Act, case was reopened and assessee has placed before the assessing authority all the material and after considering it assessment order was passed.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031