Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arihant Patni Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 442/PUN/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/07/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Arihant Patni Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)

Held that earning under Portfolio Management Services should be assessed under the head ‘Capital gains’ and not under the head ‘Profit and gains of business or profession’.

Facts-

AO made addition on account of income earned from Portfolio Management Services (PMS) as business income as against the claim of the assessee that is should be assessed under the head under capital gains.

CIT(A) held that income earned under the head PMS should be assessed under the head ‘capital gains’. Being aggrieved, the revenue has preferred the present appeal.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031