Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vishakhapatnam Port Road Company Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No.7003/Del/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/07/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Vishakhapatnam Port Road Company Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

With respect to the payment of Rs.99,000/-, it is the contention of the assessee that the amount of Rs.99,000/- was made as a provision entry for F.Y. 2015-16 relevant to A.Y. 2016-17 towards internal audit fees payment to M/s. T. R. Chadha & Co., who the internal auditors of the company. Since M/s. T. R. Chadha & Co. has raised invoice in subsequent Financial Year i.e. in F.Y. 20 16-17 after the completion of work, it was not reflected in their confirmation. Assessee has also produced the copy of account which evidences the payment of Rs. 99,000/- made to M/s. T. R. Chadha & Co. in subsequent financial year. The aforesaid contention of the assessee has not been controverted by Revenue. Considering the totality of the aforesaid facts, we are of the view that no addition was called for more so, when no evidence about the expenses being bogus in nature has been brought on record by the Revenue. We, therefore, direct the deletion of addition made by AO.

12. With respect to the addition of Rs. 1,34,880/- payable to M/s. P. Meera Anusha, it is the contention of the assessee that she is an employee of State Govt. on deputation to the company and as per the understanding with State Govt., assessee is required to pay her in addition to her salary, the leave and pension contribution and reimbursement of expenses like Telephone, newspaper etc. The assessee has also placed on record the copy of the claims towards the expenses and the leave and pension contribution made by the assessee through her parent Assessee has also demonstrated that the aforesaid amount has been paid to the assessee in subsequent year. Considering the totality of the aforesaid facts and in the absence of the any evidence placed by the Revenue to demonstrate that the payment is bogus in nature, we are of the view that no disallowance of aforesaid expenses is called for in the present case. We, therefore, direct its deletion thus the ground of assessee is allowed.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DELHI

The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 20.05.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-9, New Delhi relating to Assessment Year 20 16-17.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031