This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Limitation on Refund of Personal Ledger Accounts (PLA) deposit
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Chandigarh)
PLA (Personal Ledger Accounts) deposits are mere deposits for the purpose of their utilisation in the future and the same is not duty, in which case the provision of section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 would not apply and if the same is not in a position to utilise, the depositor has to be held as the owner of the said amount which is required to be refunded to them in the absence of any limitation prescribed under the Act for such refunds.
Even the Hon’ble High Court of ...
