Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Chandigarh) PLA (Personal Ledger Accounts) deposits are mere deposits for the purpose of their utilisation in the future and the same is not duty, in which case the provision of section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 would not apply and if the same is not in a position to utilise, the depositor has to be held as the owner of the said amount which is required to be refunded to them in the absence of any limitation prescribed under the Act for such refunds. Even the Hon’ble High Court of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930