Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shree Sita Edibles Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 151/RPR/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/05/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shree Sita Edibles Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)

ITAT find that the issue involved in the present appeal lies in a narrow compass, i.e., as to whether or not, a short deduction of tax at source by the assessee would call for triggering the provision of Sec. 40(a)(ia) of the Act for disallowing the amount in question on a proportionate basis as had been done by the A.O in the present case before us. In our considered view, short deduction of tax at source by an assessee by wrongly taking recourse to a wrong provision as provided in Chapter XVII-B of the Act and deducting tax at source at a lower rate cannot form a basis for triggering the provisions of Sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act. Our aforesaid conviction is fortified by the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court in the case of CIT Vs. S.K Tekriwal (2014) 361 ITR 432( Cal.). In its aforesaid judgment, it was observed by the Hon’ble High Court that if there is any shortfall due to any difference of opinion as to the taxability of any item or the nature of payments falling under various TDS provisions, then the assessee can though be declared to be an assessee in default u/s.201 of the Act but no disallowance can be made by invoking provisions of Sec. 40(a)(ia) of the Act.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT RAIPUR

The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(Appeals)-II, Raipur (C.G.), dated 19.06.2018, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O under Sec.143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 25.02.2016 for assessment year 2013-14. Before us the assessee has assailed the impugned order on the following grounds of appeal:

“1. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming disallowance of Rs.20,12,600/- made by the AO invoking section 40(a)(ia), without appreciating the facts and the law properly. The disallowance made by the A.O and sustained by the Ld. CIT(A) is arbitrary, illegal, contrary to settled law and is not justified.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031