Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCJ Securities Private Limited Vs ITO (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 6415/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/05/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

PCJ Securities Private Limited Vs ITO (Delhi High Court)

1. This Court is actually surprised that despite an elaborate mechanism of checks and balances and multiple authorities like (assessment units, verification units, technical units, review units, Regional Faceless Assessment Centres and National Faceless Assessment Centre) being set up under Section 144B of the Act, such glaring mistakes can happen.

2. This Court is also of the view that faceless assessment does not mean that no responsibility can be fixed for passing such an erroneous order.

3. The PCIT, National Faceless Assessment Centre is directed to be more cautious while passing the Assessment Orders and the CBDT is directed to ensure that such glaring mistakes do not occur in the future.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DELHI HIGH COURT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031