Case Law Details
Case Name : Bird Audio Electronics Vs Commissioner of CGS (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bird Audio Electronics Vs Commissioner of CGS (CESTAT Delhi)
CBEC Circular No.423/56/98-CX dated 22.09.1998 also stresses the need for concerned Departments to issue timely demands through SCN. The Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore vs. Pricol Ltd. reported as 2015 (320) ELT 703 (Mad.) has held that the SCN , as provided under section 11A of CEA, is mandatory in nature and the same has to be adhered to before proceeding further in the matter. The Circular is binding on the Departmental authorities. Hence, the Hon’ble Court held that in ab...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

