Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Jayesh A Dalal (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling no. UP ADRG 72/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/01/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Jayesh A Dalal (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh)

AAR  observe that the applicant has not submitted any relevant document to establish the coverage of services provided by them in particular functions entrusted to a municipality under the twelfth Schedule to Article 243W of the Constitution. The nature of services mentioned in the Work Order dated 16.01.2019 (attached by the applicant in the application of advance ruling on sample basis) i.e. preparation of DPR and Project Management Consultancy are not covered in the functions entrusted to a municipality under Article 243W of the Constitution in our view.

In view of the above, both the members of AAR unanimously ruled as under;

Q-1 whether the project Development service (i.e Detailed Project Report service) and project Management Consultancy services (PMCS) Provided by the Applicant to recipient under the Contract for SUDA And the Project Management Consultancy services (“PMC”) under the Contract for PMAY would  Qualify as an Activity in relation to Function entrusrted  to Panchayat or Municipality  under Article 243G or Article 243W respectively, of the Constitution of India?

Ans- No.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031