Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Chandan Milk & Agro Products Pvt. LTD. (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ST/88092/13
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/12/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Urvashi Porwal

Urvashi PorwalBrief of the Case

In the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad Vs. Chandan Milk & Agro Products Pvt. LTD, it was held that the benefit of payment of penalty of 25% of tax liability cannot be extended if the assessee has not paid the amount of tax, interest and 25% of the penalty within 30 days from the receipt of the order.

Facts of the Case    

The issue involved in this case is that Revenue is aggrieved by the impugned order on the ground that the first appellate authority has reduced the penalty imposed under Section 78 to 25% of the tax liability which he could not have done so and also set aside the penalty imposed under Section 76 for the period September 2007 to 9th May 2008 relying upon the provisions of Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031