Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs C. Gangadhara Murthy (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-2010 to 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs C. Gangadhara Murthy (ITAT Bangalore) Conclusion: Penalty proceedings under section 271D or 271E were independent proceedings and had nothing to do with assessment proceedings or its outcome. Therefore, CIT(A) was not justified in cancelling the orders imposing penalty on the ground that the assessment proceedings, during the course of which, penalty u/s.271D and 271E were initiated had been held to be invalid. Held: AO noticed that assessee had taken cash loans in violation of the provisions of Sec.269SS and repaid cash loans in violation of the provisions of Sec.269T and hence penalt...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930