Case Law Details
Case Name : ACIT Vs Farah Khan (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No.4428/Mum/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/07/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
ACIT Vs Farah Khan (ITAT Mumbai)
During the course of assessment proceedings, it transpired that the assessee owned 6 flats / units (A3501A, A3501B, A3501C, A3601A, A3601B & A3601C) on 35th & 36th floor of a Building namely Oberoi Sky Heights situated at Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri (West), Mumbai. All the units were stated to be used as office-cum-residence for the assessee. It was submitted that a specified part thereof was used by her as office and remaining part was used for the purpose of residence. For the specified part which was being used as office, the assessee claimed deduction of expenditure as per following details: –
