Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ram Prasad Sharma Vs. Chief Commissioner And Another (Madhya Pradesh High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No.16119/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/11/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ram Prasad Sharma Vs. Chief Commissioner And Another (Madhya Pradesh High Court)

Rule 142 of CGST Act reveals that the only mode prescribed for communicating the show-cause notice/order is by way of uploading the same on website of the revenue.

The State in its reply has provided no material to show that show-cause notice/order No.10 dated 10.06.2020 was uploaded on website of revenue. In fact, learned AAG, Shri Mody, fairly concedes that the show-cause notice/order was communicated to petitioner by E­mail and was not uploaded on website of the revenue.

It is trite principle of law that when a particular procedure is prescribed to perform a particular act then all other procedures/modes except the one prescribed are excluded. This principle becomes all the more stringent when statutarily prescribed as is the case herein.

In view of above discussion, this Court has no manner of doubt that statutory procedure prescribed for communicating show-cause notice/order under Rule 142(1) of CGST Act having not been followed by the revenue, the impugned demand dated 18.09.2020 vide Annexure P/2 pertaining to financial year 2019-2020 and tax period April, 2019 to July, 2019 deserves to be and is struck down.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031