Abatement of duty cannot be withheld for failure of Excise Superintendent to draw proper proceedings
Case Law Details
Case Name : Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (Tripura High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Tripura High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (Tripura High Court)
In terms of sub-rule (5) of Rule 6 of the Chewing Tobacco and Unmanufactured Tobacco Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2010, the machines which the manufacturer does not intend to operate would be uninstalled and sealed by the Superintendent of Central Excise and removed from the factory premises under his physical supervision. For the period during which the machine is thus rendered incapacitated, the concerned manufacturer would be spared the burden of excise d...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


