Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Bhalchandra Trading P. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2977/Mum/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/02/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Bhalchandra Trading P. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

It is not in dispute that assessee had indeed received on-money for sale of flats to the tune of Rs. 2,20,00,000/- during the year under consideration. It is not in dispute that the assessee had incurred certain business expenses out of such on-money which are kept outside the books of accounts. Hence, it will be just and fair that only the profit element embedded on any such undisclosed transaction could be brought to tax on an estimated basis. The assessee had already pleaded that on-money transactions were offered by the assessee’s group concerns @12% of on-money receipts before the Hon’ble Income Tax Settlement Commission and the same has been accepted by the Settlement Commission. Hence, the data and information was indeed available with the ld. CIT(A) to have some rational basis to make profit estimation in the hands of the assessee herein by following 12% thereof from the order of Hon’ble Income Tax Settlement Commission. Accordingly, we direct the ld. AO to add only 12% of on-money receipts as undisclosed income of the assessee for the year under consideration. Accordingly, the ground No.1 & 2 raised by the assessee is partly allowed.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

These appeals in ITA No.2977/Mum/2019 & ITA No.2978/Mum/2019 for A.Y.2013-14 & 2014-15 arise out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-54, Mumbai in appeal Nos.CIT(A)-54/IT-10394/DCCC-6(2)/2017-18 & CIT(A)-54/IT-10397/DCCC-6(2)/2017-18 respectively dated 18/02/2018 & 13/02/2019 respectively (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.153A r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 27/12/2017 by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 6(2), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).

Since identical issues are involved in both the appeals, these appeals are taken up together and disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031