Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kesharwani Sheetalaya Sahsaon Allahabad Vs CIT (Allahabad High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kesharwani Sheetalaya Sahsaon Allahabad Vs CIT (Allahabad High Court) Conclusion: Addition under section 68 for not proving the source of income of partners who have made the deposit with the firm in their capital account could not be made as partners had shown the agricultural income in their personal returns of the past years which had been accepted by the department as such and the partners were all identifiable and separately assessed to tax thus, the source of investment having been explained and therefore, the addition could not have to be considered in the hands of the partners and not ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031