This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
HC denies relief from Compulsory 20% deposit in Bogus Cash Credit case
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Jindal ITF Ltd. Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Jindal ITF Ltd. Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court)
It is seen that the entities M/s Glebe Trading Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Danta Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. have been used as conduits in availing unsecured loans covered u/s 68 of the Act. The identity and creditworthiness of the above companies and genuineness of the transaction of unsecured loans received from them is not established. Based on initial submissions of the assessee on the issue, independent field enquiries were caused to be carried out and the findings were confronted to the assessee. The assessee in response has failed t...
