Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pr. CIT Vs M/s. Lee & Murihead Pvt Ltd (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 229 of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/04/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Pr. CIT Vs M/s. Lee & Murihead Pvt Ltd (Bombay High Court)

Sub-section (2) of section 14A of Income Tax Act, 1961  provides that Assessing Officer would determine the amount of expenditure incurred in relation to income which not forms part of total income if he is not satisfied with the correctness of claim of assessee in respect of such expenditure. If expenditure already voluntarily disallowed by assessee was found to be reasonable, Assessing Officer in any case could not have resorted to rule 8D of Income Tax Rules.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT

1. This appeal is filed by the Revenue to challenge the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal” for short).

2. Following questions are presented for our consideration :-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031