Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Padam Chand Pungliya Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shri Padam Chand Pungliya Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) Conclusion: Penalty under section 271AAB could not be imposed on assessee as old jewellery found in the locker of assessee and family members could not be treated as undisclosed for the purpose of levying penalty. Held: Department recovered some jewellery from assessee during the course of search proceedings and brought the same under the head ‘undisclosed income’ by observing that it represented the bullion and valuable articles and in the absence of the same found recorded in the books of account of assessee it was undisclosed income as per...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930