Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mr. Jatin Mavani Vs M/s. Rare Township Pvt. Ltd (RERA)
Appeal Number : Complaint No. CC006000000055013
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/12/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : RERA
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mr. Jatin Mavani Vs M/s. Rare Township Pvt. Ltd (RERA)

The record shows that the complainant was also one of the member of the Rising City Ghatkopar Association. The said fact has not been denied by the complainant. The said complaint was filed with the MahaRERA by the allottees seeking directions from MahaRERA to allow cancellation of the flat bookings by the allottees who want to do so without cancellation fees and direct the respondent to refund the amount paid by the allottees along with interest and compensation. In the said complaint after hearing the arguments of both the side, the MahaRERA has already given verdict directing the respondent promoter to execute the registered agreements for sale with the members of the Rising City Ghatkopar Association. Since the complainant is also a party to the said proceeding , he can not separately agitate this complaint before the MahaRERA, as it will amount to agitate multiple proceedings on the same issue, which is not permissible in RERA Act, 2016. In the present case since the MahaRERA has already given judgment in the proceeding filed by the complainant through the Rising City Ghatkopar Association, the same issue can not be agitated before the MahaRERA again.

Full text of the order of Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Mumbai

1. The above named complainant has filed this complaint with MahaRERA seeking directions to the respondent to refund the amount paid by him to the respondent along with interest at the rate of 24% PA for the delayed possession in respect of booking of a flat in the respondent’s project known as ‘Rising City- Atlanta Heights’ at Ghatkopar bearing MahaRERA Registration No. P51800000756.

2. This matter was heard on several occasions. During the hearings, both the parties sought further time to settle the matter amicably. However in spite of several meetings, both the parties could not reach to the mutually agreeable terms. Hence this matter was finally heard on 16-11-2018. After hearing the arguments of both the side the MahaRERA granted liberty to both the parties to file written submissions on record of MahaRERA.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031