Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nivea India Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09 to 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nivea India Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)  TPO had not brought on record the fact that AMP expenses incurred by assessee were not for its own business. The sole basis on which adjustment, under the head AMP expenditure, was made was that expenditure incurred by assessee was significantly higher than that of its comparable on application of bright line test. There is a subtle but definite difference between product promotion and brand promotion. In the first case product is the focus of advertisement campaign and brand takes secondary or backseat, whereas in second case, brand is highlighted ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930