Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

CA Bimal Jain

In exercise of the power conferred under Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (the Customs Tariff Act), the Central Government vide Notification No.100/2005-Customs dated November 29, 2005 (Notification No. 100) hadlevied Anti-Dumping Duty on Acrylonitrile Butadiene for a period of five years from the date of its initial imposition and provided that the said levy can be further extended to one year if the Directorate General of Anti-Dumping and Allied Duties (the DGAD) initiate the sunset review in the matter of levy of Anti-Dumping Duty before the expiry of aforesaid five years.

However, reportedly Anti-Dumping Duty was being demanded and levied under Notification No. 100 by various Customs Authorities on Acrylonitrile Butadiene at the time of its clearance despite the fact that the DGAD had not initiated sunset review in the matter of levy of Anti-Dumping Dutyon Acrylonitrile Butadiene before the expiry of Notification No. 100, interms of Section 9A(5) of the Customs Tariff Act which reads as under:

“Provided further that where a review initiated before the expiry of the aforesaid period of five years has not come to conclusion before such expiry, the anti-dumping duty may continue to remain in force pending the outcome of such a review for a further period not exceeding one year.”

Now, the Central Government vide Circular No. 05/2015-Customs dated January 28, 2015, has clarified that since the sunset review has not been initiated by the DGAD in respect of extension of imposition of Anti-Dumping Duty on Acrylonitrile Butadiene, hence Anti- Dumping Duty cannot be levied and collected on the same after the lapse of five years from the date of its imposition.

Circular No. 05/2015-Customs

F.No.354/104/2014-TRU

Dated-  28th January, 2015

Subject: Collection of anti-dumping duty beyond the validity period – Regarding.

I am directed to refer to the Board’s Circular No.28/2011-Customs, dated 8th July 2011 on the above subject and to state as under.

2.  Circular No.28/2011-Customs, dated 8th July 2011 was issued in the context of a representation received in March, 2011 that anti-dumping duty was being demanded and levied under notification No.100/2005-Customs dated 29th November, 2005 by various Customs authorities on Acrylonitrile Butadiene at the time of its clearance, despite the fact that Directorate General of Anti Dumping and Allied Duties (DGAD) had not initiated sunset review in the matter of levy of anti dumping duty on Acrylonitrile Butadiene, before the expiry of the said notification on 8th June, 2010. It was also represented that in the absence of any initiation of a sunset review, the anti-dumping duty lapses at the expiry of 5 years from the date of its initial imposition.

3. Since in the said case, the DGAD had not initiated any sunset review, the levy under notification (No.100/2005-Customs) could not have been extended (for one year) in terms of the 2nd Proviso to Section 9A (5) of the Customs Tariff Act, which reads as under:

“Provided further that where a review initiated before the expiry of the aforesaid period of five years has not come to conclusion before such expiry, the anti-dumping duty may continue to remain in force pending the outcome of such a review for a further period not exceeding one year.

4. However, reportedly field formations were still collecting anti-dumping duty. It was in this context that the Circular No.28/2011- Customs dated 8th July 2011 was issued so as to clarify that in such cases, definitive/final anti-dumping duty can be collected only for a period of five years from the date of its imposition.

5. In view of the above, Para 3 of the Circular No.28/2011-Customs, dated 8th July 2011 is substituted as under:

“3. From a plain reading of this provision it is evident that definitive/final anti-dumping duty can be collected only for a period of five years from the date of its imposition. Generally by virtue of sub-section (2) of section 9A of the Customs tariff Act, 1975, the anti-dumping duty levied in pursuance of final findings of the Directorate General of Anti-Dumping and Allied Duties (DGAD) is effective for a period of five years from the date of imposition of provisional duty except in cases where the DGAD initiates a review before expiry of such five year period. In cases where the DGAD has not initiated any sunset review before the expiry of aforesaid five years, no anti-dumping duty can be collected beyond the period of five years from the date of its imposition.”.

(Malay Samir)

Technical Officer (TRU)

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031