Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sales Emporium (ULG) Vs. Income Tax Officer (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 332/Kol/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/01/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Sales Emporium (ULG) Vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

The learned counsel for the assessee has raised the same contention as raised before the authorities below that in the absence of any contract entered into between the assessee and the concerned 3 persons, the provision of section 194C was not applicable and there was no question of deduction of tax at source. I am unable to accept this contention of the learned counsel for the assessee. As rightly held by the authorities below, when the amount in question was paid by the assessee to the concerned 3 persons at the fixed rate on monthly basis for the specified services rendered by them, there was bound to be an oral contract on the basis which the services were agreed to be rendered on retainer ship basis. The assessee, therefore, was liable to deduct tax at source in terms of section 194C and having failed to do so, the amount in question was liable to be disallowed under section 40(a)(ia).

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031