Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DHL Air Ltd. Vs. Dy. CIT (IT) (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1438/Mum/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/10/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2012- 13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DHL Air Ltd. Vs. Dy. CIT (IT) (ITAT Mumbai)

The impugned expenditure has been incurred by the assessee in pursuance of maintenance contract between the assessee and M/s. EAT, Germany. In the case of Kandla Port Trust (supra), it was held that the payment made for annual maintenance contracts would not fall under the category of fee for technical services within the meaning of provisions of section 194J of the Act. In the case of DDRC SRL Diagnostic (P) Ltd. (supra), the co-ordinate bench has noticed that the CBDT has expressed the view in Circular No. 715 (supra) that routine, normal maintenance contracts which includes supply of spares will be covered by section 194C of the Act. The bench further noticed that the revenue could not produce any material to show that the clarifications issued by the CBDT would not apply to the facts available in the case before it. Accordingly the bench held that the provisions of section 194C shall apply to the payment made towards maintenance contracts.

In the instant case also, no material was placed before us to show that the clarifications issued by the CBDT would not apply to the facts of the present case. Hence, consistent with the view taken in the above cited cases, we hold that the payment made towards annual maintenance contracts would fall under the category of works contract. In that view of the matter, the payment given by the assessee would constitute business receipts in the hands of M/s. EAT and the same is not taxable in India, since it does not have PE in India. In that case, there is merit in the contentions of the assessee that it is not required to deduct tax at source under section 195 of the Act, as no part of the amount paid to M/s. EAT is chargeable in India in the hands of M/s. EAT. Accordingly we set aside the order passed by assessing officer on this issue and direct him to delete the impugned additions.

Tax deduction at sourceUnder section 195Payment for normal annual maintenance contract

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031