Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs American Express India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 4422/Del./2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/10/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2002-03
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah

DELETION OF PENALTY IN CASE OF BONAFIDE BELIEF OF AN ASSESSEE: ESPECIALLY WHEN THE ACTION OF ASSESSEE IS SUPPORTED BY FACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES AND A DECISION

Section 271 (1)( c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) deals with the penalty in respect of failure to furnish returns, comply with notices, concealment of income, etc.

Recently, in DCIT vs. American Express India Pvt. [ITA No. 4422/Del./2014, decided on 06.10.2017], one of the ground in appeal was whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT (A) had erred in deleting the penalty of Rs.54,37,000 imposed under section 271 (1 )(c) of the Act, ignoring the fact that patently a wrong claim had been made by the assessee of treating the interest on income tax refund as income derived from the export of articles or things or computer software by 100% Export Oriented Undertaking(EOU) and thereby it amounted to filing inaccurate particulars of income.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031