This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
HC cannot proceed to hear a second appeal without formulating substantial question of law
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Maharaja Amrinder Singh Vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
In this case High Court proceeded to decide the appeals without formulating the substantial question(s) of law. Indeed, the High Court did not make any effort to find out as to whether the appeals involved any substantial question(s) of law and, if so, which is/are that question(s) and nor it formulated such question(s), if in its opinion, really arose in the appeals. The High Court failed to see that it had jurisdiction to decide the appeals only on the question(s) so formulated and not beyond it. [Section 27(5)]. In view of that the impugned orders are not legally sustainable and thus liab...
