HC cannot proceed to hear a second appeal without formulating substantial question of law

In this case High Court proceeded to decide the appeals without formulating the substantial question(s) of law. Indeed, the High Court did not make any effort to find out as to whether the appeals involved any substantial question(s) of law and, if so, which is/are that question(s) and nor it formulated such question(s), if in its opinion, really arose in the appeals. The High Court failed to see that it had jurisdiction to decide the appeals only on the question(s) so formulated and not beyond it. [Section 27(5)]. In view of that  the impugned orders are not l

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.