Case Law Details
Case Name : ITO Vs Sh. Dinesh Jain (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2009- 10
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CA Prarthana Jalan
Hon’ble Delhi ITAT in the case of Dinesh Jain has held that Penalty u/s. 271E is leviable if a person repays any loan, otherwise, than in accordance with provisions of section 269T. As per section 269T no person shall repay the loan otherwise, than by an account payee cheque or account payee bank draft drawn in the name of the person who has made the loan. Now in this case admittedly the assessee has transferred the loan by way of journal entry to his wife. Therefore, the question is whether there is violation of section 269T so as to penalise the assessee as requir...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
it is a ITAT case, not of High Court
This is ITAT case not Delhi HC, please rectify the authority name in summary.
Dear Sir, (CA Prarthana Jalan)
I am a regular reader of Taxguru. Especially read your articles are presented very nice. Thank you very much for taxguru and you for the updates.
I would like to know whether this judgment (i.e. ITO Vs. Sh. Dinesh Jain, ITA No. 3794/Del/2013, Date of order: 16-05- 2014) pronounced by ITAT, Delhi Bench or by Hon’ble Delhi High court.
I understand that the said judgment pronounced by ITAT, Delhi Bench.
Kindly clarify.
J.Janarthanan