Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Nature of TDS Liability in Respect of Salaried Doctors, in- House & Visiting Consultants in a Nursing Home

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2016 taxguru.in 513
Case Name
Hosmat Hospital (P.) Ltd. vs. ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2011-12, 2012-13 & 2013-14
Advertisement

Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah

Preface:

Chapter XVII of the Income-tax Act, 1961, herein referred to as the Act, incorporates provisions for collection and recovery of tax and Part B of this Chapter deals with the Tax Deduction at Source [TDS]. Tax has to be Deducted at Source in respect of different type of payments according to different sections in Part B of the Chapter XVII.

A Recent Appeal In Brief Before ITAT, Bangalore:

Recently, in the Hosmat Hospital (P.) Ltd. vs. ACIT [IT Appeal Nos. 572, 575, 576, 879, 880 & 881 (BANG.) of 2014, AYs 2011-12 TO 2013-14, decided on 11.08.2016], the assessee-company was engaged in the business of health-care. The TDS officer conducted survey operations on 25/02/2013 under the provisions of sec.133A of the Act with the intention of verifying TDS compliance by the assessee-company. During the course of such survey operations, it was found that the assessee-company is employing three categories of Doctors viz., salaried Doctors, in- house Consultants and Visiting Consultants. It was also found that the assessee-company has been deducting tax at source in respect of in-house Consultants and Visiting Consultants under the provisions of sec.194J of the Act. The TDS Officer also found agreements entered into by the assessee-company with the Consultant Doctors. The TDS officer, thereafter, noticing the clauses in agreements had come to conclusion that TDS was required to be deducted under section 192 of the Act.

The TDS Officer also found that the agreements entered into with salaried doctors by the assessee, also contained similar terms and conditions which governed the employment of consultant doctors. Therefore, he concluded that consultant doctors are also salaried employees of the assessee and thus held that the assessee-company was in default for not deducting tax at source under section 192 of the Act. The TDS officer also charged interest under the provisions of section 201(1A) of the Act apart from tax liability under section 201(1) of the Act. He, thus passed an order demanding the assessee-company to pay tax as under

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.