Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT-3 Vs. M/s. Air Cargo Agents Association of India (Bombay high Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 2455 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/03/2016
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
CA Saurabh Chokhra

Brief of the case:

The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the above cited case held that merely because a part of surplus was invested in mutual funds it cannot mean that it would  render  the principle of mutuality  inapplicable more so when the invested money has to be utilized for the furtherance of association’s objectives and the income from mutual fund dividends has been offered to tax.

 Facts of the case:

The assessee is an association of Air Cargo Agents in India. During the subject assessment year 2007-08 it received subscription/contribution from its members in three forms i.e. annual subscription, member’s annual convention and member’s training programmes aggregating to contribution from the members of Rs.54.07 lakhs.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031