Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Income-tax Officer Vs Shri Mineshkumar Shantilal Patel (ITAT Ahemdabad)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 643/Ahd/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/01/2013
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Section 269SS is attracted when the loan or deposit taken or accepted otherwise than by account payee cheque or account payee bank draft and in the Explanation (iii) below Sec.2 69SS, it is mentioned that loan or deposits means “loan or deposit of money” and transfer between two accounts by way of journal entry does not imply receipt of loan or deposit in money terms. When there is no violation of Section 269SS there is no question of levy of penalty of u/s.271D. The penalty of Rs. 24,74,700/- (sic.) is thus directed to be deleted.

ITAT “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

BEFORE SHRI MUKUL Kr.SHRAWAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER And
SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031