Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Smt. B Sumangaladevi (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA NO.5049/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/10/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

When Clause 11 of the instruction No.3/11 dated 09.02.2011 issued by the Board, specifically says that it will be applicable to the cases filed on or after 9.2.2011, the courts holding that it is applicable to the pending cases is against the provision under Section 268A of the Act, Public Interest and the Public Policy. Therefore, we uphold the contention of the revenue that the Instruction No.3 dated 09.02.2011 has no retrospective effect and the appeal filed by the revenue is maintainable. Accordingly, we answer the 1st substantial question of law, in the negative in favour of the Revenue.

HIGH COURT OF  KARNATAKA

ITA NO.5049/2010

1. The Commissioner of Income Tax

2. The ACIT (Inv)

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031