Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bazpur Co-operative Sugar Factory Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-II (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Stay Order No.. ST/S/533/2012-CUS
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/04/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

CESTAT, NEW DELHI BENCH

Bazpur Co-operative Sugar Factory Ltd.

V/s.

Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-II

STAY ORDER NO. ST/S/533/2012-CUS

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. SATISH CHOUBEY says:

    I want to share expErt suggeStions and hire authorities decision in regard of SERVICE PROVIDED BY PERSON WHO DOES NOT ISSUE CONSIGNMENT NOTE IS NOT TAXABLE

  2. Siddharth Kothari says:

    HI SIR…………
    THANKS FOR SHARING………………
    AS PER THIS OPINION IT’S NOT COMPULSORY TO ISSUE CONSIGNMENT NOTE BY THE TRANSPORTER OF GOODS BY ROAD EVEN THOUGH IT’S MENTIONED UNDER RULE 4B OF THE SERVICE TAX RULES.IT WILL BECOME SIMPLE FOR THEM NOT FALL IN THE CRITERIA BY NOT ISSUING THE CONSIGNMENT NOTE.EVEN IT’S NOT MENTIONED UNDER RULE 4B THAT FOR WHOM IT’S MANDATORY TO ISSUE CONSIGNMENT NOTE.SO IT’S BIG LOOPHOLE UNDER THE SERVICE TAX FOR GTA AND MOST OF THE GOODS TRANSPORT AGENCY AND SERVICE RECEIVER TAKING THE BIGGEST ADVANTAGE OF THIS LOOPHOLE.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031