This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 14A – Onus on AO to show expenditure incurred to earn tax-free income
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs SIL Investment Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2006-07
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
In “CIT v. Hero Cycles” (supra), it was held by the Punjab & Haryana High Court, inter alia, that the contention of the Revenue that directly or indirectly some expenditure was always incurred, which must be disallowed u/s 14A of the Act and the impact of the expenditure so incurred could not be allowed to be set off against the business income which may nullify the mandate of section 14A, could not be accepted;
and that the disallowance u/s 14A required a finding of incurring of expenditure and where it was found that for earning exempted income, no expenditure had been incurred, di...
