Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Parijat Hotels Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Parijat Hotels Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Section 43B Deduction Cannot Be Lost Due to Inadvertent Non-Claim in Return – ITAT Gives Fresh Opportunity to Verify Property Tax Payment The Pune ITAT held that a genuine claim under section 43B deserves verification even if it was not specifically claimed in the original return, particularly where the assessee demonstrates that the expenditure had been disallowed in earlier years and was actually paid during the relevant year. The assessee-company sought deduction of ₹49.24 lakh towards property tax paid to the Pune Cantonment Board. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Technical Glitch in Form 26A Filing Cannot Trigger Section 40(a)(ia) Disallowance: ITAT Bangalore Form 26AS Alone Cannot Decide Taxability of FD Interest: ITAT Bangalore Entire Bogus Purchases Not Taxable If Sales Accepted; Only Profit Taxable: ITAT Bangalore Bangalore ITAT Reaffirms that Transfer Pricing Adjustment Must Be Restricted Only to International Transactions with AEs Reassessment Quashed as New Allegations Exceeded Section 148A Proceedings: Karnataka HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031