Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajdhani Textiles Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rajdhani Textiles Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 68 Addition Deleted – Suspicion on Lender’s Finances Cannot Replace Evidence Mumbai ITAT deleted substantial additions made u/s 68 (₹5.57 crore for AY 2012-13 and ₹10.45 crore for AY 2013-14) along with interest disallowance, holding that mere doubts about lender’s financial strength cannot justify addition without concrete evidence. The Tribunal observed: Additions were made solely based on Investigation Wing inputs and analysis of lenders’ balance sheets, not on any incriminating material or cash trail The assessee ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930