Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mahendra Brothers Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-2007
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mahendra Brothers Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT deleted penalties levied u/s 271(1)(c) across multiple years, holding that failure to specify the exact charge (concealment vs. inaccurate particulars) in notice u/s 274 renders penalty proceedings invalid. The Tribunal observed: The AO issued standard/omnibus notices without striking off irrelevant limb, making the charge ambiguous Such defective notice violates principles laid down by Bombay HC (Full Bench) in Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh Penalty proceedings are independent and must clearly inform the assessee of the specific allegation Additio...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930